|
 |
|
Printers'
National
Environmental
Assistance
Center
|
Fact Sheet
|
PNEAC
www.pneac.org
1-888-US-PNEAC
|
|
Printing Inks
Commercial Printing
Printing inks may contain material that makes them hazardous, such as metals used for
coloring and solvents used to accelerate drying. In addition, because most printing inks
are petroleum-based, they may have significant volatile organic compound (VOC) content.
The Clean Air Act Amendments regulate overall VOC emissions from printers, so the extent
to which inks contribute to VOCs is important (see Fact Sheet #10: "Printer's Guide
to Environmental Regulations"). In response to increased demand and more stringent
regulations, ink manufacturers are making a concerted effort toward eliminating VOCs. This
fact sheet describes some of the pollution prevention and waste management options for
printers related to ink.
Best Management Practices
Printing inks are expensive and any opportunities to minimize waste ink can help save
money. Waste ink is generated through color changes, press cleaning and poor ink
management, which allows drying and skinning. But effective management techniques can help
reduce waste ink. Don't treat excess ink as waste instead, manage it like a product
that should be reintroduced into the system when possible. Best management practices to
help avoid waste include:
- Help press operators accurately estimate the amount of ink needed for each job through
training in ink estimating techniques. Keep accurate records of the quantity of ink that
is used for specific jobs, particularly for reorders or repeat customers.
- Keep ink containers sealed and contents level; place plastic or wax paper on top of the
ink to prevent drying; use anti-skinning sprays.
- Scrape as much ink from empty containers as possible prior to disposal or recycling.
- Use a standard ink sequence and try to schedule print runs from light to dark, if
possible.
- Carefully monitor inventory to ensure a "first in-first out" strategy.
- Donate off-spec ink to schools or give it to another printer rather than paying for
disposal.
Reuse Excess Ink
Excess ink is the result of overestimating ink usage at the press or at the time of ink
purchase. Whenever possible, return unopened cans of excess ink to the supplier. Reusing
excess ink can reduce both disposal and purchase costs. Some options:
- Mix excess ink, including black or colored inks, on-site to produce black ink. Many
printers like the quality of the black ink produced from mixing colored inks because of
the high quality of colored inks.
- Mix non-contaminated excess ink with virgin ink of the same color.
- Use a computer-controlled mixing program in conjunction with a digital scale for mixing
PMS colors. Mixing programs range in price from $300 $2500. Many printers find the
systems very user friendly and are satisfied with the inventory reduction they achieve.
Soy and Vegetable Inks
Soy- and vegetable-based inks were popular during the oil crisis in the early 1970s.
But as presses became faster, petroleum-based inks displaced slow-drying vegetable-based
inks. Now increased emphasis on improving worker safety and reducing environmental
emissions has sparked renewed interest in vegetable oil-based inks, and many printers and
suppliers are trying to address quality concerns found in early versions of these and
other alternative inks. Vegetable oils can reduce total VOCs in an ink formulation. Among
the vegetable candidates for oil base in ink, soybean oil is the most promising. Some
advantages of soy-based inks:
- Some printers, especially newspaper printers, have managed to achieve high quality with
all color soy inks except black. Newspaper inks can contain a high vegetable oil content
due to the absorbency of newspaper. Because the ink dries solely by absorption, it is
possible to substitute all of the petroleum and 100% soy formulations are available.
- Soy inks are less likely to build up on the plate, have less tendency to skin over, and
have greater stability.
- They permit greater latitude in ink-water balance, allowing more flexibility in press
settings, and provide greater coverage per pound of ink.
- Soy oils tend to be clearer than petroleum oils, so the colors can be brighter. Also,
some printers claim that soy ink pickup and transfer is quicker, resulting in shorter
start-ups and less waste.
- Many printers claim that soy inks are more forgiving and thus make it easier to run a
high quality job on older equipment. It is sometimes easier and faster to change from a
dark to a light color ink with soy than with petroleum-based inks.
|
 |
- Soy inks tend to work well with recycled paper. Because of the flow of ink, soybean inks
don't pick out the fibers of the paper and they adhere better.
- Soy-printed products are easily deinkable by wastepaper processors and they produce a
less hazardous sludge, making them more recyclable than petroleum-printed products.
But there are drawbacks. Soy ink often costs more than conventional inks, but the cost
is expected to decrease. The drying times for soy inks are considerably slower,
particularly on coated paper. Thus, pure soy-based inks cannot be used in the heatset
process. As a result, soy-based oils still contain a certain percentage of petroleum. The
American Soybean Association (ASA) has developed a "Soy Seal" certification
program. Table 1 summarizes the percentages of soy content necessary for qualification.
Another disadvantage is that soy inks may still contain small quantities of hazardous
substances, and may have to be managed as hazardous waste.
SUMMARY OF PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION ALTERNATIVES TO SOLVENT-BASED INKS
|
| Alternative |
Applications |
P2 Benefits |
Operational Advantages |
Operational
Disadvantages |
Cost |
Product Quality |
Limitations |
| Vegetable Oil Heatset Inks |
Lithographic web presses |
Reduced VOC emissions and worker exposure
to petroleum oils |
Less ink build-up; greater stability;
increased flexibility |
Slower drying time; poor drying can result
in set-off, marking and poor rub resistance |
No capital cost; ink cost can be 5%-8%
higher |
Similar quality |
Heatset requirements limit replacement of
petroleum oils; ink dryer contributes to VOC emissions; ink waste may still be hazardous |
| Vegetable Oil Non-heatset Inks |
Lithographic non-heatset web and sheet-fed
presses |
Reduced VOC emissions and worker exposure
to petroleum oils |
Can provide better print quality, brighter
colors, better pickup and transfer |
Slower drying time |
No capital cost; ink cost slightly higher |
Similar quality; brighter colors and
improved clarity |
Usually some petroleum oils; ink waste may
still be hazardous |
| Vegetable Oil Newspaper Inks |
Lithographic web presses |
Reduced VOC emissions and worker exposure
to petroleum oils; 100% replacement o petroleum oils possible |
Better color reproduction; better color
control; less rub-off; less tendency to build up or skin over; greater stability; smoother
flow; better coverage; greater ink-water balance parameters permit greater flexibility |
Usually slower drying time |
No capital cost; higher ink cost may be
offset by reduced newsprint spoilage |
Higher quality color printing; similar
quality black printing |
May contain some petroleum oils; ink waste
may still be hazardous |
| Vegetable Oil Form Inks |
Lithographic non-heatset web presses |
Reduced VOC emissions and worker exposure
to petroleum oils |
Smoother flow; better coverage |
Slower drying time |
Slightly higher ink cost |
Higher quality color printing |
May contain petroleum oils; ink waste may
still be hazardous |
| UV Curable Inks |
Lithographic web and sheet-fed presses |
No ink-derived VOC emissions or worker
exposure to petroleum oil; reduced process waste |
No ink drying on press reduces frequency
of press cleaning; rapid curing; no set-off; no need for ventilation of printed sheets |
|
Capital equipment cost; high ink cost;
lower energy use than thermal drying; increased productivity |
Good gloss and durability; print quality
may be less clear; possible adhesion problems on some materials (aluminum, steel, some
plastic |
Workers must be protected from UV light;
some toxic chemicals in inks; may cause skin sensitivity; ventilation needed to reduce
ozone buildup; paper difficult to recycle |
| EB Curable Inks |
Lithographic web and sheet-fed presses |
No ink-derived VOC emissions or worker
exposure to petroleum oil; reduced process waste |
No ink drying on press reduces frequency
of press cleaning; rapid curing; no set-off; no need for ventilation of printed sheets |
|
Capital cost; considerably higher ink cost |
Print quality less clear |
Workers must be protected from EB light;
some toxic chemicals in inks; may cause skin sensitivity; often degrade paper; paper
difficult to recycle |
| Water-Based Inks |
Flexographic and gravure presses |
Little or no ink-derived VOC emissions or
worker exposure to alcohol; replacement of solvent-based cleaners and fountain solutions
with safer substitutes |
Hold color and viscosity longer during
press runs; more coverage per pound of ink; reduces the need for make-up solvent during
printing |
More frequent equipment cleaning; less
forgiving of equipment imperfections, may cause paper curl |
May require new capital equipment; greater
energy use; reduced hazardous waste disposal and liability costs |
Similar quality with new equipment; low
ink gloss on porous substrates |
May contain low level of solvent; ink
waste may still be hazardous; greater energy use for drying |
(Source: Alternatives to Petroleum- and Solvent-Based Inks, TURI
Fact Sheet 6)
Radiation-curable Inks
Ultraviolet (UV) and electron-beam (EB) inks cure by polymerization upon
exposure to UV or EB energy. They contain no solvents and therefore release no VOCs. They
will not cure until exposed to the energy source so they can be left in the fountain for
long periods of time, thereby reducing cleanup. They can be used on both web and sheetfed
presses.
The major drawback is cost. Small printers will not be able to afford the
$1 million starting price and the inks are more expensive than conventional or soy inks.
Also, there is the risk of employee exposure to UV and x-ray energy, so safety devices are
necessary. Finally, paper printed with these inks are often difficult to recycle because
of the high molecular weight and difficult fiber/ink separation.
Vendors and Suppliers
Indication herein of specific vendors and suppliers does not imply
endorsement, nor does omission imply a refutation by the Montana State University
Extension Service Pollution Prevention Program. |
Ink
Reclamation Systems |
Separation Tech, Inc.
740-H South Van Buren
Placentia, CA 92800
(714) 632-1306 |
Semlar Industries,
Inc.
3800 North Carnation
Franklin Park, IL 60131
(708) 801-5650 |
Ink
Reblending |
Mixmasters, Inc.
11 Colmer Road
Lynn, MA 01904
(800) 332-9321 |
|
Water-
and
Soy-Based Inks |
Flint Ink, Corp.
1812-B Mactavish
Richmond, VA 23230
(804) 353-1231 |
Sun Chemical
3435 West Leigh Street
Richmond, VA 23230
(804) 355-8068 |
|
Ink
Recycling |
3R
800 Vinial Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15212
(412) 323-1733 |
Pro Active Recycling, Inc. 908
Niagara Falls Blvd. N. Tonawanda, NY 14120
(716) 692-0465 |
|
| Inks |
Resourcenet/Dixon Paper Co.
1495 Monad Road
Billings, MT 59102
(406) 252-2103 |
Gans Ink & Supply Co. 1919 W.
2300 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
(800) 453-8242 |
Gans Ink & Supply Co 3448 NW
Yeon Portland, OR 97210
(800) 624-6393 |
Gans Ink & Supply Co
1701 Fourth Ave. Seattle, WA 98134
(800) 435-0045 |
VanSon, Holland Ink
Corporation 92 Union Street Mineola, NY 11501
(800) 648-3937 |
Sources:
Alternatives to Petroleum- and Solvent-Based Inks, Fact Sheet 6, Massachusetts
Toxics Use Reduction Institute
Guides to Pollution Prevention: The Commercial Printing Industry, EPA, August
1990.
Moscuzza, S. "Environmentally Friendly Ink Products," GATFWorld
January/February 1996, p. 30.
"The Printer's Ink: Towards a 'Greener' Pressroom," Graphic Arts Journal,
November 1994, p. 23-24.
"Soy Ink: Just Full of Beans?" The Printing Manager, July/August
1991, p. 4-6.
"Waste Reduction Evaluation of Soy-Based Ink at a Sheet-Fed Offset Printer,"
Environmental Protection Agency, Project Summary, September 1994. |
 Produced
by Todd MacFadden, Pollution Prevention Technical Specialist and Michael P. Vogel, Ed.D.,
Pollution Prevention Director, with funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
June, 1996. |
|
| Reasonable effort has been made to review and
verify information in this document. Neither PNEAC and its partners, nor the technical
reviewers and their agencies, assume responsibility for completeness and accuracy of the
information, or its interpretation. The reader is responsible for making the appropriate
decisions with respect to their operation, specific materials employed, work practices,
equipment and regulatory obligations. It is imperative to verify current applicable
regulatory requirements with state and/or local regulatory agencies. |
|