From: Bill Bilkovich (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jul 12 1997 - 16:19:37 CDT
Just a note. The Solvent PM (CAS 2807-30-9) is ethylene glycol monopropyl
TRI-reportable compound (as a member of the glycol ether category). If
you really need volatiles, you
might ask the formulator to try one of the propylene glycol ethers which
are orders of magnitude less toxic because they use a different metabolic
Bill Bilkovich, EQC
3651 Cherry Bluff Ln
Tallahassee, Fl 32312-1001
Fax 904-894-2480 Voice 904-894-2780
On 1 Jul 1997, Jeff Adrian wrote:
> 7/1/97 12:51 PM
> We have already eliminated the use of methylene chloride containing solvent.
> The reason methylene chloride was helpful in lithography is that it served as
> a cleaner for metering rolls on the water fountain side of the press, and it
> worked because it dried quickly, did not leave an oily film on the surface of
> the solution in the fountain, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, had sufficient "slip" so
> as to not grab the wiper being used.
> Our substitute is blended by Chemical Marketing Co. in Minneapolis. It is
> called "Blanket Wash 92" and contains Lacoline (64742-879-8), Ethanol 200
> (64-17-5), and Solv PM (2807-30-9). It has a vapor pressure of 43mmHg, and a
> flash point of 45 F. You may contact them at 612-377-1971.
> We discovered this us by accident. Originally, this product was selected as a
> replacement for Type Cleaner (our restricted use, heavy-duty cleaner).
> I hope this gets you pointed in a useful direction.
> Jeff Adrian
> The John Roberts Company
> Date: 7/1/97 12:28 PM
> To: Jeff Adrian
> From: email@example.com
> I recently became aware of the (new) OSHA rule on methylene chloride
> exposure, and the requirement to monitor employees where it is used. As I
> understand it, it requires initial monitoring of employees by Aug 8, 1997
> ( >20 employees) and by February 4, 1998 for employers w/ <20 employees.
> In printing, lots of mixtures contain small amounts of methylene chloride,
> and the rule apparently contains no deminimus. Is there guidance developed
> especially for the printing industry? OSHA's fact sheets deal with severall
> other industries, but I haven't yet seen anything for printers.
> It appears that we may need to gear up for a major information campaign, or
> work with suppliers to find (or list) available substitutes. Instead of
> reinventing, I'd like to borrow from someone else's research to get something
> out. Has anyone already crossed this bridge?
> George Frantz MA/OTA 617-727-3260 x631 (fx) 617-727-3827
> ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
> Received: by johnroberts.com with ADMIN;1 Jul 1997 12:27:32 -0500
> Received: (from majordom@localhost) by cedar.cic.net (8.8.5/CICNet) id
> MAA09471 for printreg-out; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 12:55:41 -0400 (EDT)
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 97 11:37:35 EDT
> Message-ID: <vines.ne29+ZSHinA@vinesgw1.state.ma.us>
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: "Bizzozero-ENV, Rich" <Rich.Bizzozero@state.ma.us> (rich bizzozero),
> "Cain-ENV, James" <James.Cain@state.ma.us> (james cain)
> From: "Frantz-ENV, George" <George.Frantz@state.ma.us> (george frantz)
> Subject: Methylene Chloride & printers
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain;
> Sender: email@example.com
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
Email the PNEAC Webmaster